Skip to main content

A Specially Constructed Hydroconductive Wound Dressing to Eliminate Peristomal Maceration and Excoriation Around Tracheostomies and Enteric-cutaneous Tubes

Pearls for Practice

A Specially Constructed Hydroconductive Wound Dressing to Eliminate Peristomal Maceration and Excoriation Around Tracheostomies and Enteric-cutaneous Tubes

Index: Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016;62(9):8,10.

When left for a period of time on the skin, bodily fluids and exudates can cause irritation ranging from peristomal dermatitis to maceration to skin loss. The chemical dermatitis is due to irritants in the fluids such as irregular pH, unbalanced electrolytes, bacterial products, and increased enzyme content.1 The exact content varies depending on whether the internal source is pulmonary, urinary, or enteric. The exudate from a tracheostomy site can be copious, watery, or viscous, and contain blood, bacteria, and/or injurious cytokines. Similarly, the effluent leaking around enteric-cutaneous tubes such as gastrostomy or jejunostomy tubes can cause maceration and excoriation. Historically, passive absorptive dressings such as gauzes, foams, hydrofibers, or alginates have been used to absorb exudate and effluent but with poor success of preventing skin problems.2 

A specially constructed hydroconductive dressing (Drawtex Tracheostomy and Tube Dressing (SteadMed Medical LLC, Fort Worth, TX), known to draw off excessive exudate, bacteria, and harmful chemicals, was tested in a series of 30 patients as a means to protect and treat the skin problems accompanying tracheostomy or enteric-cutaneous tube usage.3 The dressing has a central hole with radial cuts to allow a snug fit around tubes of various diameters (see Figure 1). It also has interlocking cuts that can spread for easy application and then refitted to hold the dressing in place (see Figure 2). The dressing was used in patients with acute tracheostomy or tube placements and in persons with chronic tube placements with less exudate or effluent; the dressing was changed daily. The peristomal skin was serially evaluated for skin maceration, excoriation, or breakdown. 

The hydroconductive dressing proved effective in all acute and chronic tracheostomy cases, as well as all enteric-cutaneous tube cases. It drew exudate, debris, bacteria, and chemicals into the dressing and prevented peristomal skin problems. The dressing proved to be useful in cases using both silastic and metal tracheostomy tubes (see Figure 3) regardless of the type of enteric-cutaneous tube utilized (see Figure 4).

The Drawtex Tracheostomy and Tube dressing proved useful in a large series of cases in preventing skin injury from bronchial discharges and enteric effluents exuded from tracheostomies or enteric-cutaneous tubes. Its unique capacity to draw injurious substances away from the skin and into the substance of the dressing protected the skin to a greater degree than has been reported for more passive absorptive dressings.2


Pearls for Practice is made possible through the support of SteadMed Medical, LLC, Fort Worth, TX ( The opinions and statements of the clinicians providing Pearls for Practice are specific to the respective authors and not necessarily those of SteadMed Medical, LLC; OWM; or HMP Communications. This article was not subject to the Ostomy Wound Management peer-review process.