Volume 57 - Issue 2 - February 2011

My Scope of Practice: Skin-Saving CNAs — Power in Leadership and Education

If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself. — Henry Ford



Pearls for Practice: Managing Diabetic Foot Wounds in Home Health Patients

  The goal of home care is to return clients to independence within their maximum health status; therefore, the home health nurse focuses on teaching the patient or caregivers how to manage the medical condition, perform dressing changes, and monitor healing.



February New Products and Industry News

Foam dressing helps wounds that need bridging



Continence Coach: Lean Manufacturing for Patient-Centered Continence Care

Without standards, there can be no improvement. — Taiichi Ohno, former Toyota executive



Nutrition 411: Selecting the Right Tube-Feeding Formula

  Because of the many different tube-feeding products on the market today, formula selection can be quite confusing. The task becomes more complicated if the patient has several comorbidities. Imagine trying to select just the right formula for a patient with diabetes, renal insufficiency, and a pressure ulcer who is overweight but has very little muscle mass and states he has a history of constipation.



Feature: Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury-Induced Histological Changes Affecting Early Stage Pressure Ulcer Development in a Rat Model

Abstract
  Pressure ulcers (PU) are caused by the interplay of multiple factors including skin microcirculation. Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is considered a significant mechanism in the early stages of pressure ulcer development. The objective of this controlled, single-blinded in vivo study was to create a pressure-induced injury rat animal model and explore the possible mechanism and effects of I/R injury in early stage PU development using clinically relevant amounts of pressure and pressure duration. Forty-eight animals were randomly divided into six groups of eight and a 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm area of the hip was subjected to no pressure (control), ischemia only (IG – 2 hours of 70 mm Hg pressure), or one of four I/R cycles (70 mm HG of pressure for 2 hours followed by 1, 2, 3, or 4 hours of reperfusion). All I/R cycles were repeated three times. Full-thickness skin samples from the compressed area were harvested for histopathology and femoral artery blood samples obtained to measure serum levels of the following inflammatory mediators: malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD) nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin-1 (ET-1). MDA, NO, and ET-1 levels were significantly higher in the IR than the control (P <0.01) and ischemia groups (P <0.05); whereas, SOD activity was significantly lower than in the IG and control groups (P <0.05). The largest differences were observed in the 2-hour ischemia/3-hour reperfusion group. Biopsy analysis by lightmicroscopy stain showed no changes in the control, mild changes in the IG, and considerable damage, including leukocyte infiltration, collagen fibrosis, and edema in epidermal, dermal, and muscle tissue from the I/R group. These findings suggest that hypoxic-ischemic tissue injury occurs early following a period of ischemia and that I/R may be an important mechanism in PU development. Although the mechanisms of I/R injury are probably multifactorial and the actions of free radicals may be more complicated in the early stages of PU development in humans, the findings suggest that a minimum of 4 hours pressure relief may be helpful for PU prevention. Research to elucidate these mechanisms and their potential interactive effects to help clinicians develop evidence-based prevention protocols are warranted.



Feature: Interprofessional Management of a Complex Continuing Care Patient Admitted With 18 Pressure Ulcers: A Case Report

Abstract
  Interprofessional practice (IP) — ie, collaborative practice — involves interaction and knowledge-sharing between professionals from different disciplines in order to meet the needs of the patient. This approach to care is well suited to patients with pressure ulcers, whose complex and varying presentations require the monitoring and consultation of an IP team. A 44-year-old man with anoxic brain injury was admitted to a complex continuing care facility with 18 wounds, 17 of which were pressure ulcers. The patient was at high risk for further skin breakdown as a result of immobility, incontinence, impaired cognition, impaired sensation, low body weight, and positioning challenges secondary to contractures and spasticity. Wounds were located primarily around the patient’s sacrum, trochanters, feet, and ankles. The care team included a physician, unit manager, clinical nurse educator, nurses, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, registered dietician, and pharmacist, all with varying roles related to wound care. The patient’s wife was concerned about his overall health status and wanted to move him out of his room in a wheelchair to spend time with him. Using current best practices, the IP team implemented management strategies that facilitated wheelchair time during family visits; plus, all 18 wounds healed within 15 months of admission. The patient did not develop any new areas of skin breakdown. IP collaboration facilitated the problem-solving needed to meet the complex needs of this patient.



Executive Spotlight: Kimberly Herman, President, Chronic Care, Coloplast Corp

Coloplast develops products and services that make life easier for people with very personal and private medical conditions. Working closely with the people who use their products, Coloplast creates solutions that are sensitive to their special needs. Kimberly Herman, President of Chronic Care provides and in-depth look inside this remarkable business that includes ostomy care, continence care, and wound and skin care. The following interview offers a glimpse as to what it takes for a healthcare company to operate globally and employ more than 7,000 people.



Hope in Practical Resolve

  Last year, Newsweek compiled a list of statistics to illustrate how much of what people generally worry about is based on perception, not reality or an understanding of risk. For example, we generally worry more about murders (14,180 in 2008) than suicides (33,289 in 2006). Shark attacks are headline news (28 in 2009); dog bites rarely are (average annual estimate: 4.5 million). Many people are concerned about flying (fatal airline accidents: 321 in 2005) but don’t think twice about getting in the car (fatal car crashes: 34,017 in 2008).



Feature: Pressure Ulcers: Avoidable or Unavoidable? Results of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Consensus Conference

Abstract

  Although pressure ulcer (PrU) development is now generally considered an indicator for quality of care, questions and concerns about situations in which they are unavoidable remain. Considering the importance of this issue and the lack of available research data, in 2010 the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) hosted a multidisciplinary conference to establish consensus on whether there are individuals in whom pressure ulcer development may be unavoidable and whether a difference exists between end-of-life skin changes and pressure ulcers. Thirty-four stakeholder organizations from various disciplines were identified and invited to send a voting representative. Of those, 24 accepted the invitation. Before the conference, existing literature was identified and shared via a webinar. A NPUAP task force developed standardized consensus questions for items with none or limited evidence and an interactive protocol was used to develop consensus among conference delegates and attendees. Consensus was established to be 80% agreement among conference delegates. Unanimous consensus was achieved for the following statements: most PrUs are avoidable; not all PrUs are avoidable; there are situations that render PrU development unavoidable, including hemodynamic instability that is worsened with physical movement and inability to maintain nutrition and hydration status and the presence of an advanced directive prohibiting artificial nutrition/hydration; pressure redistribution surfaces cannot replace turning and repositioning; and if enough pressure was removed from the external body the skin cannot always survive. Consensus was not obtained on the practicality or standard of turning patients every 2 hours nor on concerns surrounding the use of medical devices vis-à-vis their potential to cause skin damage. Research is needed to examine these issues, refine preventive practices in challenging situations, and identify the limits of prevention.



  • « Previous
  •  | Page 1 of 2 | 
  • Next »