Vulnerable Populations: Considerations for Wound Care
- Fri, 5/15/09 - 12:13pm
- 0 Comments
- 5108 reads
Abstract: Race/ethnicity, immigration, health insurance, and literacy — along with patient-provider communication and understanding of and adherence to treatment protocols — are societal factors that affect the provision of optimal healthcare. Wound care practitioners should be aware of the need to address these factors in vulnerable groups, including the effects of racial/ethnic care disparities, immigration, low income, uninsured or underinsured status, and literacy/health literacy on health and wound care. The literature shows that care is not always perceived to be or equitably provided across different ethnic and economically diverse populations. Hence, clinicians must strive to listen to and interact non-judgmentally with vulnerable patients. Each patient’s physical and psychosocial concerns must be assessed without malice and clinicians must work with community, state, and federal agencies to enhance access to necessary services. Wound care patient teaching materials need to be developed that consider the literacy and language skills of the community served. Once the type of wound and its appropriate treatment are determined, wound care practitioners must consider patient teaching, vulnerability, cultural, and economic constraints of care, along with strategies for prevention of complications and hospitalizations.
Key Words: wound care, immigrants, low income, uninsured, health literacy
Dr. Pieper is Professor and Nurse Practitioner, College of Nursing, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. Please address correspondence to: Barbara Pieper, PhD, CNS-BC, CWOCN, FAAN, College of Nursing, Wayne State University, 5557 Cass Avenue, Detroit, MI 48202; email: bpieper@wayne.edu.
In the United States, approximately 5 million chronically ill patients have wounds; the aggregate cost of their care has been documented at more than $20 billion annually.1 Because individuals with wounds represent varied racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups, this high number of persons with wounds must be examined in terms of racial/ethnic diversity, poverty, immigration status, and health insurance limitations. In 2000, approximately 33% of the US population identified self as a member of racial or ethnic minority group; by 2050, these groups are projected to account for half of the US population.2 The 2007 National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR) used the US Bureau of the Census statistic to define poor people; in 2005, the Federal poverty threshold for a family of two adults and two children was $19,806; the number of poor Americans increased from 11.3% to 12.6% or to 37 million persons between 2000 to 2005. Racial and ethnic minorities are more likely than non-Hispanic Caucasians to be poor or near poor. Poverty by race/ethnicity group included Black/African-American (25%), Hispanic (22%), Asian (11%), and Caucasian (8%).2 The NHDR noted overall care disparities in quality and access to healthcare for minority groups and poor populations did not decline from 2000 to 2001 although progress has been made in some areas.2 The purpose of this paper is to explore US societal factors — ie, racial/ethnic disparities, immigration, low income, the uninsured and underinsured, and literacy/health literacy — that have an impact on health and wound care.
Strategies to reduce costs of wound care have included correct diagnosis, treatment appropriate to the cause and conditions of the wound, and prevention of complications and hospitalizations.3 As a way to coordinate care, the number of wound care centers has increased throughout the country. Attinger et al4 noted the success of wound care centers is based on a multidisciplinary team approach, use of evidence-based treatment protocols, efficient clinical structure, and a supportive hospital system.
1. Rees RS, Bashshur N. The effects of TeleWound management on use of service and financial outcomes. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13(6):663–674.
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2007 National Healthcare Disparity Report. Rockville, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; February 2008. AHRQ Pub. No. 08-0041.
3. Drew P, Posnett J, Rusling L. Wound Care Audit Team. The cost of wound care for a local population in England. Int Wound J. 2007;4(2):149–155.
4. Attinger CE, Hoang H, Steinberg J, et al. How to make a hospital-based wound center financially viable: the Georgetown University hospital model. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(2 suppl):S92–S97.
5. Anderson LM, Scrimshaw SC, Fullilove MT, Fielding JE, Normand J, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Culturally competent healthcare system — a systematic review. Am J Prevent Med. 2003;24(3 suppl 1):68–79.
6. Wolff M, Bates T, Beck B, Young S, Ahmed SM, Maurana C. Cancer prevention in underserved African American communities: barriers and effective strategies – a review of the literature. Wis Med J. 2003;102(5):36–40.
7. Stepanikova I, Cook KS. Effects of poverty and lack of insurance on perception of racial and ethnic bias in health care. Health Serv Res. 2008;43(3):915–930.
8. Copeland VC, Scholle SH, Binko JA. Patient satisfaction: African-American women’s views of the patient-doctor relationship. J Health Soc Policy. 2003;17(2):35–48.
9. Burgess D, van Ryn M, Dovidio J, Saha S. Reducing racial bias among health care providers: lessons from social-cognitive psychology. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(6):882–887.
10. Johnson RL, Roter D, Powe NR, Cooper LA. Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(12):2084–2090.
11. Heritage J, Robinson JD, Elliott MN, Beckett M, Wilkes M. Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: the difference one word can make. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(10):1429–1433.
12. Heins JK, Heins A, Grammas M, Costello M, Huang K, Mishra S. Disparities in analgesia and opioid prescribing practices for patients with musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2006;32(3):219–224.
13. Riley III JL, Wade JB, Myers CD, Sheffield D, Papas RK, Price DD. Racial/ethnic differences in the experience of chronic pain. Pain. 2002;100(2002):291–298.
14. Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby J, Anderson KO. Ethnicity, control appraisal, coping, and adjustment to chronic pain among black and white Americans. Am Acad Pain Med. 2005;6(1):18–28.
15. Ruehlman LS, Karoly P, Newton C. Comparing the experiential and psychosocial dimensions of chronic pain in African Americans and Caucasians: findings from a national community sample. Am Acad Pain Med. 2005;6(1):49–60.
16. Green CR, Baker TA, Smith EM, Sato Y. The effect of race in older adults presenting for chronic pain management: a comparative study of black and white Americans. J Pain. 2003;4(2):82–90.
17. Nguyen M, Ugarte C, Fuller I, Haas G, Portenoy RK. Access to care for chronic pain: racial and ethnic differences. J Pain. 2005;6:301–314.
18. Pieper B, Hopper JA. Injection drug use and wound care. Nurs Clin N Am. 2005;40(2005):349–363.
19. Kalauokalani D, Franks P, Oliver JW, Meyers FJ, Kravitz RL. Can patient coaching reduce racial/ethnic disparities in cancer pain control? Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Pain Med. 2007;8(1):17–24.
20. Nicholson B, Passik SD. Management of chronic noncancer pain in the primary care setting. South Med J. 2007;100(10):1028–1036.
21. Passik SD, Kirsh KL. Opioid therapy in patients with a history of substance abuse. CNS Drugs. 2004;18(1):13–25.
22. Kullgren JT. Restrictions on undocumented immigrants’ access to health services: the public health implications of welfare reform. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(10):1630–1633.
23. Torres AM, Sanz B. Health care provision for illegal immigrants: should public health be concerned? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(6):478–479.
24. Gardner DB. Immigration and health care reform: shared struggles. Nurs Econ. 2007;25(4):235–237.
25. Chang C-C, Roberts BL. Cultural perspectives in feeding difficulty in Taiwanese elderly with dementia. J Nurs Scholar. 2008;40(3):235–240.
26. Pieper B, Caliri MHL. Nontraditional wound care: a review of the evidence for the use of sugar, papaya/papain and fatty acids. J WOCN. 2003;30(4):217–223.
27. Vallerand AH, Fouladbakhsh JM, Templin TN. The use of complementary/alternative medicine therapies for the self-treatment of pain among residents of urban, suburban, and rural communities. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):923–925.
28. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(2):727–754.
29. Ngo-Metzger Q, Massagli MP, Clarridge BR, et al. Linguistic and cultural barriers to care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(1):44–52.
30. Holmes P. Telephone translators. Nurs Times. 1990;86(28):22–23.
31. Mauksch LB, Katon WJ, Russo J, Tucker SM, Walker E, Cameron J. The content of a low-income, uninsured primary care population: including the patient agenda. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16(4):278–289.
32. Onega T, Duell EJ, Shi X, et al. Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S. Cancer. 2008;112(4):909–918.
33. Pieper B, DiNardo E. Reasons for missing appointments in an outpatient clinic for indigent adults. J Am Acad Nurse Practitioner. 1998;10(8):359–364.
34. Badiaga S, Raoult D, Brouqui P. Preventing and controlling emerging and reemerging transmissible diseases in the homeless. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(9):1353–1359.
35. Davis, LR, Weller NF, Jadhav M, Holleman WL. Dietary intake of homeless women residing in transitional living center. J Health Care Poor Underserv. 2008;19:952–962.
36. Pieper B. Wound management in vulnerable populations. Rehabilit Nurs. 2005;30(3):100–105.
37. Weber EJ, Showstack JA, Hunt KA, Colby DC, Grimes B, Bacchetti P, Callaham ML. Are the uninsured responsible for the increase in emergency department visits in the United States? Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(2):108–115.
38. Hadley J. Insurance coverage, medical care use, and short-term health changes following an unintentional injury or the onset of a chronic condition. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;297(10):1073–1084.
39. Luthy KE, Peterson NE, Wilkinson J. Cost-efficient treatment options for uninsured or underinsured patients for five common conditions. J Nurs Pract. 2008;September:577–584.
40. Wilper AP, Woolhandler S, Lasser KE, McCormick D, Bor DH, Himmelstein DU. A national study of chronic disease prevalence and access to care in uninsured U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(3):170–176.
41. Devoe JE, Baez A, Angier H, Krois L, Edlund C, Carney PA. Insurance + access not equal to health care: typology of barriers to health care access for low-income families. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(6):511–518.
42. Wahrenberger PI. Patient education in the fast lane — streamline, organize, and update. Adv Nurse Pract. 2008;March;65–67.
43. Institute of Medicine. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington, DC: National Academy Press;2004.
44. Villaire M, Mayer G. Low health literacy: the impact on chronic illness management. Prof Case Manage. 2007;12(4):213–216.
45. Paasche-Orlow MK, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nielsen-Bohlman LT, Rudd RR. The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(2):175–184.
46. Wolf MS, Parker RM, members of the White Paper Commissioned by the American College of Physicians Foundation. Improving Prescription Drug Container Labeling in the United States. A Health Literacy and Medication Safety Initiative. United Health Foundation. October 12, 2007.
47. Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone MP. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(12):1228–1239.
48. Cho YI, Lee S-YD, Arozullah AM, Crittenden KS. Effects of health literacy on health status and health service utilization amongst the elderly. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:1809–1816.
49. Persell SD, Osborn CY, Richard R. Limited literacy is a barrier to medication reconciliation in ambulatory care. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(11):1523–1526.
50. Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscaizo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):173–190.
51. Kools M, van de Wiel MW, Ruiter RA, Kok G. Pictures and text in instructions for medical devices: effects on recall and actual performance. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1-3):104–111.
52. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Strategies for Improving Minority Healthcare Quality. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; January 2004. AHRQ Pub. No. 04-E008-0d2.
53. Vanderbilt SK, Wynia MK, Gadon M, Alexander GC. A qualitative study of physicians’ engagement in reducing healthcare disparities. J Nat Med Assoc. 2007;99(12):1315–1322.
54. Giger JN, Davidhizar R. Promoting culturally appropriate interventions among vulnerable populations. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2007;25:293–316.
55. Paasche-Orlow MK, Wolf MS. The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(suppl 1):S19–S26.
56. Seligman HK, Wallace AS, DeWalt DA, et al. Facilitating behavior change with low-literacy patient education materials. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(suppl 1):S69–S78.
57. Volandes AE, Ariza M, Abbo ED, Paasche-Orlow M. Overcoming educational barriers for advance care planning in Latinos with video images. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(5):700–706.
58. von Wagner C, Steptoe A, Wolf MS, Wardle J. Health literacy and health actions: a review and a framework from health psychology. Health Edu Behav. 2008;August:26.






Post new comment