Evaluation of a Once-Daily Moisturizer Used to Treat Xerosis in Long-Term Care Patients

Author(s): 
Dasie Wilson, RNC, MPA, ET, CWCN, COCN; and Denise Nix, RN, MS, CWOCN

T he body’s largest organ, the skin provides a barrier between an individual and the environment. The skin performs many functions — it protects against infectious micro-organisms, ultraviolet light, noxious substances, and excess fluid/electrolyte loss and provides the means for thermoregulation, sensation, metabolism, and communication.1 The stratum corneum (horny layer) is continuously exposed to the outside environment and provides the first line of protection, serving as a vital part of the body’s immune system.2

Xerosis (dry skin) is characterized by pruritic, erythemic, dry, scaly, cracked, or fissured skin (see Figure 1) and is a result of the loss of natural moisturization factors and barrier abilities, as well as epidermal water loss. Some bathing and skin treatment practices also are believed to contribute to or exacerbate dry skin.1,3-5 Xerosis occurs most often on the legs but may be present on the hands and trunk. It is a problem for 59% to 85% of people older than 64 years6; it is one of the most common dermatological conditions found in long-term care.7 Evidence suggests that xerosis increases the risk for additional clinical problems such as discomfort, pruritus, infection, skin tears, and pressure ulcers.8-11 The purpose of the product evaluation was to determine whether a new therapeutic moisturizing cream decreases the symptoms of xerosis.

Literature Review

Pathology. In healthy skin, skin cells called corneocytes detach from neighboring cells and are replaced by younger cells from the deeper layers. This orderly process of skin cell loss from the skin surface (desquamation) is controlled primarily by two intercellular components, corneodesmosomes and lipids, that provide for the maintenance of tissue thickness. Corneodesmosomes bind the corneocytes to maintain intercellular cohesion and tissue integrity and eventually must be broken down for desquamation to be effective. In healthy skin, this process, corneodesmolysis, eliminates the corneodesmosomes.12 In xerotic skin, corneodesmosomes persist and disturb the orderly desquamation process, resulting in the formation of visible, powdery flakes on the skin surface.13

Free water also is necessary to control the corneodesmolysis process. Adequate lipid content is required to retain the free water. Inadequately hydrated skin cannot provide this free water; therefore, deficits in both skin hydration and lipid content play a key role in xerosis.12 Consequently, the skin’s inability to retain moisture and provide an effective barrier directly affects the development of xerosis.14,15

A number of situations impact the skin’s moisture depletion. For example, xerosis tends to relapse in the winter when humidity is low.12 The daily use of cleansers and/or bathing without replacing natural skin emollients results in epidermal water loss and a depletion of skin lipids.16 Pre-existing disease states (ie, end-stage renal disease, nutritional deficiency, thyroid disease), therapies (eg, radiation), and medications render an individual more susceptible to xerosis.17

The link between xerosis and pruritus, infection, skin tears, pressure ulcers and pain.

Pruritus. Pruritus is the unpleasant sensation that elicits the urge to scratch. It has been cited as the most common and distressing anti-inflammatory skin condition.18 Although pruritus has several different causes, xerosis is thought to be associated with up to 85% of pruritus cases.3

References: 

1. Sibbald RG, Campbell K, Queen D. Intact skin — an integrity not to be lost. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49(6):27–41.
2. Lindberg B, Forslind B. The skin as a barrier. In: Lodén M, Maibach HI (eds). Dry Skin and Moisturizers, Chemistry and Function. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press;2000:27–37.
3. Hardy MA. What can we do about your patient’s dry skin. J Gerontol Nurs. 1996;22(5):11–18.
4. Nix D. Factors to consider when selecting skin cleansing products. J WOCN. 2000;27:260–268.
5. Bryant R, Rolstad B. Examining threats to skin integrity. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001;47(6):18–27.
6. Beauregard S, Gilchrest BA. A survey of skin problems and skin care regimens in the elderly. Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(12):1638–1643.
7. Norman, RA. Geriatric dermatology. Dermatol Ther. 2003;16:260–268.
8. Klingman A. Introduction. In: Loden, M, Maibach H I. (eds). Dry Skin and Moisturizers Chemistry and Function. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press;2000:3.
9. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 3: Pressure ulcers in adults: prediction and prevention. Publication No. 92-0047. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Rockville, Md. 1994.
10. Hunter S, Anderson J, Hanson D, et al. Clinical trial of a prevention and treatment protocol for skin breakdown in two nursing homes. J WOCN. 2003;30(5):250–258.
11. Cole L, Nesbitt C. A three-year multiphase pressure ulcer prevalence/incidence study in a regional referral hospital. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50(11):32–40.
12. Harding R, Mayo C, Rawlings A. Stratum corneum lipids: the effect of ageing and the seasons. Arch Dermatol. 1996;288(12):765–770.
13. Simon M, Bernard D, Minondo AM, et al. Persistence of both peripheral and non-peripheral corneodesmosomes in the upper stratum corneum of winter xerosis skin versus only peripheral in normal skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;116(1):23–30.
14. Engelke M, Jensen J, Ekanayake-Mudiyanselage S, Proksch E. Effects of xerosis and ageing on epidermal proliferation and differentiation. Brit J Dermatol. 1997;137(2):219–225.
15. Paepe K, Derde M, Roseeuw D, Rogiers V. Incorporation of ceramide 3B in dermatocosmetic emulsions: effect on the transepidermal water loss of sodium lauryl sulphate-damaged skin. J Euro Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14(4):272–279.
16. Koblenzer CS. Itching and the atopic skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104(3 pt 2):S109–S13.
17. Rowe A, Mallon E, Rosenberger P, et al. Depletion of cutaneous peptidergic innervation in HIV-associated xerosis. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;112(3):284–289.
18. Norman RA. Xerosis and pruritus in the elderly: recognition and management. Dermatol Nurs. 2000;12:116-123.
19. Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society. Clinical Practice Guideline Series No 2. Guidelines for Prevention and Management of Pressure Ulcers. Glenview, Ill. 2003.
20. Whittington K, Patrick M, Roberts J. A national study of pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in acute care hospitals. J WOCN. 2000;27(4):209–215.
21. Guralnik JM, Harris TB, White LR, Cornoni-Huntly JC. Occurrence and predictors of pressure sores in the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey follow-up. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988;36(9):807–812.
22. Kingman AM. Perspectives and problems in cutaneous gerontology. J Invest Dermatol. 1979;73:59–66.
23. Langemo DK, Anderson J, Volden C. Nursing quality outcome indicators: the North Dakota study. J Nurs Adm. 2002;32:98–110.
24. Lyder CH, Shannon R, Empleo-Frazier O, McGehee DS, White C. A comprehensive program to prevent pressure ulcers in long-term care: exploring costs and outcomes. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002;48(4):52–62.
25. Malone ML, Rozario N, Gavinski M, Goodwin J. The epidemiology of skin tears in the institutionalized elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(6):591–595.
26. Birch S, Coggins T. No-rinse, one-step bed bath: the effects on the occurrence of skin tears in a long-term care setting. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49(1):65–67.
27. Mason S. Type of soap and the incidence of skin tears among residents of a long term care facility. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1997;43(8):26–30.
28. White M, Karam S, Cowell B. Skin tears in frail elders: a practical approach to prevention. Geriatr Nurs. 1994;12:116–123.
29. Norman, RA. Causes and management of xerosis and pruritus in the elderly. Ann Long-Term Care. 2001;9(12):35–40.
30. Hill C. Joint Commission Focuses On Pain Management, 1999. Available at: http://www.jcaho.org/news+room/health+care+issues/jcaho+focuses+on+pain+.... Accessed October 9, 2005.
31. Rawlings AV, Harding CR. Moisturization and skin barrier function. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17.
32. Trung H, Exelbert L, Arlynn C, Segal O, Aristidis V. A prospective, randomized, controlled double-blind study of a moisturizer for xerosis of the feet in patients with diabetes Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001;58(5):30–36.
33. Kuzma J, Bohnenblust S. Basic Statistics for the Health Sciences (4th ed). Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield Publishing Company;2001.



Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.