Ostomy Wound Management
Search Wound Care Archive:  
Contemporary Topics in Skin, Wound, Ostomy, and Incontinence Care
Ostomy Wound Management
Ostomy Wound Home
Ostomy and Wound Management
Current Issue
Current Ostomy Wound Issue
Archives
Search Wound Care Articles
Subscribe
Ostomy Wound Management
Wound Care Events
meetings, symposiums and conferences
Classified Ads
recruitment, help wanted
Wound Care CME
Wound Care Education
E-News
Subscribe to our Enews
Hot Topic
New Wound Care Products
Author Instructions
Submission Instructions
Wound Care Resources
Supplements
Wound Care, Ostomy Care
Reprints, Rights, Permission and Translation
Contact Us | About Us
Wound Care Topics
Nutrition
Wound Care
Pressure Ulcer
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Lymphedema
Venous Leg Ulcer
Wound Pain
Wound Infection
Wound Healing
Wound Repair
Debridement
MRSA
Support Surfaces
Ostomy Topics
Ostomy Care
Colostomy
Ileostomy
Urostomy
Diverticulitis
Ostomy Appliances,
Systems, & Pouches
Ostomy Surgery
Stoma
Crohn's disease
Skin Care Topics
Skin Care
Burns
Skin tear
Perineal Dermatitis
Cellulitis
Incontinence Topics
Incontinence
Urinary Incontinence
Fecal Incontinence
Urinary Catheter

Ostomy Wound Management

  Healing a Wound with an Exposed Herrington Rod: A Case Study


T
he development of chronic wounds in spinal cord patients represents a particularly challenging dilemma because of the high rate of wound recurrence. Initial surgical management limits the options for operative treatment of the recurrent wound. Traditional nonoperative management can preserve options for future surgery but requires frequent dressing changes.
Figure 1
Pretreatment view of thoracic pressure ulcer. The wound, measuring approximately 20 cm x 15 cm, was in the area of a previous reconstruction.

       The vacuum-assisted closure (VAC, KCI Medical, San Antonio, Tex.) system may offer an alternative to treating these difficult wounds. The VAC technique uses continuous-cell foam dressing, which is attached to a subatmospheric pressure device. Although the mechanisms of action are still being fully delineated, subatmospheric pressure decreases bacteria count, removes serous fluid, reduces tissue edema, improves blood flow, and maximizes granulation tissue formation.1,2 Although this technique has been effective in a large number of patients with a variety of wounds, vascularized soft tissue remains the preferable treatment choice in wounds with exposed hardware.3
       When chronic wounds result in exposure of hardware, management can be quite difficult. Typically, these wounds require vascularized soft tissue to obtain satisfactory coverage, either with local flaps or with free-tissue transfers. This article presents a single case of a patient who underwent placement of vacuum-assisted dressing to cover exposed spinal hardware. Complete wound and hardware coverage was achieved nonoperatively without any evidence of recurrent wound breakdown.
Figure 2
Two weeks after VAC placement.


Patient History
       A 25-year-old female with spina bifida, paraplegia, and autoimmune deficiency presented with a large pressure ulcer on her back, right of the midline, at the T-10 level. The wound, measuring approximately 20 cm x 15 cm, was in the area of a previous reconstruction. Eight years before, following a severe case of necrotizing fasciitis, the patient required reconstruction of a large thoracic wound. Soft tissue coverage was obtained using a combination of skin grafts, local flaps, and free-tissue transfer. Vein grafts were used to create an arteriovenous loop from the iliac, and free-tissue transfer was performed using the right rectus abdominus muscle. The wound was stable for 10 years until a traumatic injury led to a recurrent breakdown with exposure of Herrington rod spinal stabilization hardware.
       The previous surgeries had severely limited the options for surgical coverage. Use of local flaps left significant scarring around the area and transected the local blood flow available for local flaps. Because the inflow vessels of the groin had been used, free-tissue transfer would require multiple vein grafts from the contralateral groin and was likely to be unsuccessful. The hardware at the base of the wound made the use of antibiotics alone unlikely to address the chronic bacterial load. In addition, the proximity of the hardware to the spine presented a significant potential threat for osteomyelitis.

Treatment
       To stabilize the wound, a VAC dressing was placed in anticipation of a repeat free-tissue transfer. Two weeks later, evaluation demonstrated good granulation tissue that covered the hardware completely. Treatment with the VAC dressing was continued for an additional 3 months until the defect filled completely and epithelial coverage was noted at the wound edge.
Figure 3
Ten weeks after VAC placement.


Discussion
       Multiple factors affect the ability of a chronic wound to heal. Particularly in the paraplegic patient, factors such as neurovascular alterations, nutritional status, and skin integrity can inhibit proper healing.4 Bacterial colonization is typical in chronic wounds, making healing even less likely when a foreign body is present. Frequently extensive debridement, wound stabilization, and vascularized tissue coverage are needed to avoid removal of hardware, if present. Unfortunately, this necessitates hospitalization, surgery, and postoperative care.
       Using a VAC dressing has several advantages. First, it obviates the need for hospitalization as well as complications from a surgical procedure.5 Also, the VAC system can be applied on an outpatient basis and dressings can be performed by home health nursing staff two to three times a week. Nonoperative management preserves the options for surgical coverage if future wounds develop.6
Figure 4
View of completely healed wound, 18 weeks after VAC placement.

       The VAC's disadvantages include the need for continued nursing care and the potential for prolonged healing. Although VAC dressing changes are less frequent, they can be more difficult than traditional dressings and are also more expensive. Often, the use of the vacuum device is not covered by third-party reimbursement, which can be a significant burden to the patient. Placement of the VAC may impair mobility when the suction device is connected to the wound unless a portable suction device is employed.
       Surgical coverage is the primary management for spinal cord injury patients with chronic wounds, despite a significantly increased recurrence rate.7,8 However, in selected patients the VAC dressing may offer a nonoperative alternative and preserve limited surgical options. If the wound heals with the VAC, local flaps or free-tissue transfer can be used for recalcitrant wounds. VAC can be used to successfully obtain wound coverage in difficult patients, as illustrated in this case, where suitable wound healing in the face of chronic bacterial load and a foreign body was achieved. - OWM


1. Greer SE, Duthie E, Cartolano B, et al. Techniques for applying subatmospheric pressure dressing to wounds in difficult regions of anatomy. J WOCN. 1999;26:250-253.
2. Hartnett JM. Use of the vacuum-assisted wound closure in three chronic wounds. JWOCN. 1998;25:281-290.
3. Argenta LC, Morkwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38:563-576.
4. Rodriquiez DJ, Benzel EC, Clevenger FW. The metabolic response to spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:599-604.
5. Goodman CM, Cohen V, Armenta A, et al. Evaluation of results and treatment variables for pressure ulcers in 48 veteran spinal cord-injured patients. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:665-672.
6. Deva AK, Buckland GH, Fisher E, et al. Topical negative pressure in wound management. Med J Aust. 2000;173:128-131.
7. Disa JJ, Carlton JM, Goldberg. Efficacy of operative cure in pressure sore patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:272-278.
8. Niaza ZB, Salzburg CA, Byrne DW. Recurrence of initial pressure ulcer in persons with spinal cord injuries. Advances in Wound Care. 1997;10:38-42.

Ostomy/Wound Management - ISSN: 0889-5899 - Volume 48 - Issue 5 - May 2002 - Pages: 18 - 19
 
For a single copy of an article that has appeared in Ostomy Wound Management, please contact the Editor: .

For permission to photocopy UP TO 100 COPIES or to use material electronically from articles appearing in Ostomy Wound Management, please visit: www.copyright.com.

For author reprints, please contact our agent Lori Laughman at The Sheridan Press at .

For 100 or more commercial reprints/eprints, please contact our agent, Beth Ann Rocheleau at Rockwater, Inc, at: .

For more information on reprints, rights, permissions and translation, CLICK HERE.

 



© 2008 HMP Communications | 83 General Warren Blvd, Suite 100 | 800-237-7285