Part 1: Assessment and Management of Stomal Complications: A Framework for Clinical Decision Making

Author(s): 
Jane Ellen Barr, RN, MSN, CWOCN, ANP

S toma complications can be classified into five major categories based on either the etiology or location: Poor Siting, Stoma Proper, Peri-Intestinal Area, Mucocutaneous Junction, and Iatrogenic. The categories are a modification of the framework presented by Celestine.1 Stoma Proper complications are further subdivided into four types of complications: necrosis, retraction, prolapse, and bleeding. An example of a peri-intestinal area complication is herniation. Mucocutaneous junction complications are divided into subcategories of: bleeding, detachment or separation, and stenosis. The iatrogenic stoma complication most often noted in the literature is stomal laceration or trauma.

Poor Siting

A common and usually avoidable complication often seen in clinical practice relates to poor siting of the stoma during surgery. A "poor site" is one in which the stoma is sited in a location or position that makes it difficult if not impossible for a person to perform the necessary cleansing and pouching system management, conceal the stoma under clothing, and enjoy the normal freedom of movement without fear of leakage. Poor stoma siting clinically presents as a stoma sited close to prominent bones, in the vicinity of old scars or the umbilicus (see Figure 1), on the main incision (see Figure 2), or in deep peristomal creases. Leakage and the resultant peristomal irritant contact dermatitis are the clinical manifestations the patient most often experiences because of poor stoma siting.2

Prevention is the best management. Persons who are to have stoma surgery must have their stoma site selected preoperatively by a certified ostomy nurse or their surgeon. Stoma site selection is done while assessing the patient in various positions (eg, standing, sitting, and supine). Abdominal contours may change with position change and abdominal folds and creases become more pronounced in the sitting position. The basic rules for stoma site selection are to place the stoma through the rectus muscle, at the apex of the infra-umbilical fat mound, at least 4 inches from the planned incision, and far enough from umbilicus, bony prominences, scars, incision site, or skin creases to allow proper application and adherence of the pouching system. Waist- and beltline should be avoided for cosmetic reasons. It is also necessary to avoid selecting a stoma site on skin previously damaged from radiation, burns, or skin grafting. Once selected, the stoma site is either marked by an indelible marking pen or tattooed with indelible ink at the center of the selected site.3,4 Certain situations such as obesity, cachectic patients, pendulous breasts, and physically challenged persons (such as those confined to wheelchairs or wearing braces) may require special considerations when selecting stoma sites.

Poor stoma siting often results in leakage beneath the pouching system. If a patient presents with leakage related to improper pouching system fit over deep peristomal creases, the clinician must correct the defect by matching the pouching system to the patient's contours - eg, using a flexible pouching system that folds with the patient's abdominal movements. When the patient has a soft abdomen, using a firm faceplate, convexity, and a belt supports the peristomal tissues and eliminates the crease. When the creasing is only on one side of the stoma, barrier strips or wedges can create an even pouching surface. If scars, gullies, or defects prevent a good pouching seal, filling these with barrier paste (small defects) or moldable barrier wedges or strips (large defects) will help prevent leakage beneath the pouching system. Measures to increase pouching system adherence also may help.

References: 

1. Celestine LR. A Colour Atlas of the Surgery and Management of Intestinal Stomas. Chicago, Ill.: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc.;1986.
2. Turnbull GB. The ostomy assessment inventory: a data-gathering process to enhance appropriate pouching system selection. Ostomy/Wound Management. 1998;44(2):28–37.
3. Erwin-Toth P, Barrett P. Stoma site marking: a primer. Ostomy/Wound Management. 1997;43(4):18–25.
4. Watt R. Stoma placement. In: Broadwell D, Jackson B, eds. Principles of Ostomy Care. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby;1982.
5. Beck DE. End sigmoid colostomy. In: MacKeigan JM, Cataldo PA, eds. Intestinal Stomas: Principles, Techniques, and Management. St. Louis, Mo.: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc;1993:104–105.
6. DelPino A, Citron JR, Orsay CP, et al. Enterostomal complications: are emergently created enterostomas at greater risk? Am Surg. 1997;63(7):653–656.
7. Lennen LH, Kupyers JHC. Some factors influencing the outcome of stoma surgery. Dis Colon & Rectum. 1989;32:500–504.
8. Duchesne JC, Wang YZ, Weintraub SL, et al. Stoma complications: a multivariate analysis. Am Surg. 2002;68(11):961–986.
9. Martin R.. Assessment of stomal necrosis: the test tube. J WOCN. 2001;28:233–236.
10. Abrams J. Late complications. In: Abdominal Stomas. Boston, Mass.: John Wright PSG, Inc.;1984:145–146.
11. Gordon PH, Rolstad BS, Bubrick MP. Intestinal stomas. In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S, eds. Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum and Anus, Edition 2. St. Louis, Mo.: Quality Medical;1999.
12. Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society. 2003. Stoma complication: a best practice document for clinicians. Available at www.wocn.org. Accessed July 25, 2004.
13. Hanion M. Surgical and nonsurgical options for a patient with a retracted stoma and peristomal skin crease. J WOCN. 2001;28:219-222.
14. Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1562–1572.
15. Corman M. Intestinal stomas. In: Colon and Rectal Surgery, Edition 3. Philadelphia, Pa.: Lippincott;1993.
16. d’E Stevens P. Prolapsing loop colostomy in the face of advanced colorectal cancer: the use of osmotic therapy for irreducible stomal prolapse. WCET Journal. 1997;18(1):14–16.
17. Myers J, Rothenberger D.. Sugar in the reduction of incarcerated prolapsed bowel – a report of two cases. Diseases of Colon and Rectum. 1991;34(5):416–418.



says: June 18.2009 at 16:48 pm

Excellent article.

Reply to this comment »

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.